Second question: why work?  Men are not being taught to want their job
to value them, in fact, men want as little to do with their jobs as
possible.  Randi and the globalism party bus are teaching women to want
"careers"-- more precisely, to want to draw more of their identity from
their careers.  The perk of taking your work home with you isn't more
money, it's acceptance of your individuality.  Also you get to have to
shop at Ann Taylor.  Before you seize on this as a biological flaw in
women's character, let me remind you that they want work to accept
their individuality because their family and relationships have failed
them in this regard.  The only place they feel... happy?-- is when they
are at work or plugged in.  "I know The Bachelor is mindless TV, but I
just like it."  Keeps your husband out of the room, anyway.  How great
is it to be alone? Third question: what are the consequences of Randi's
utopian fantasy of your job valuing you as an individual for everyone
else at work? She believes her authentic self, via Facebook, should be
accepted everywhere, home and work, so the suits should just shut their
greed vacuums and embrace her baby pictures, her individuality-- after
all, that's why they hired her, right? That sounds laudable-- except
that she's lying.  Ok, I have to pretend not to be sickened by her baby
pictures, will she Like me live-posting My Summertime Threesomes?
Huh.  So now individuality has an asterisk: since Facebook should be on
at work, everyone's Facebook should be nonthreatening, not mean, safe--
work appropriate. "Well, stupid, just don't put naked pics on
Facebook."  Fair enough, but whereas before it was my poorly thought
out choice, now it is not allowed by work. "Well, Facebook shouldn't be
on at work."  Duh, of course it won't be on at work, no company would
allow Facebook to be on at work, there's work to be done.   So "ok at
work" really means "if work saw it" and "Facebook" really means "the
internet."