1. Child Love Scale
2. Jump to: navigation, search
3.  
4. It is considered to be very important to be able to rate a child lover. The media try to brand all as abusers, however according to scientific research and experience we know isn't the case. There needs to be a consistent definition of the degrees of child love in order to be able to effectively communicate, and understand one's standing efficiently. More complex pathos including homosexual child love, should be complemented by other scales, such as the scale used by Kinsey. This scale is a communication tool, but also embodies theories based on personal observations of Chawowah.
5. Contents
6.  
7.     1 The Child Love Scale
8.         1.1 Inverse Abuse
9.         1.2 Neutral
10.         1.3 Passive
11.         1.4 Active
12.         1.5 Borderline
13.         1.6 Abuser
14.         1.7 Homosexuality
15.     2 Scientific Analysis
16.  
17. The Child Love Scale
18.  
19.     Inverse Abuse - Kids should be prohibited from all sexual experiences and issues. Scientific research confirms that such prohibition often leads to impeded orgasm and sexual performance for the rest of life, as well as pathological issues such as vaginismus, stress and depression.
20.     Neutral - Kids are cute, no issue with child nudity.
21.     Passive - Kids are cute/sexy, nudity is appreciated, may fantasize of next level.
22.     Active - Kids are sexy, nudity is sought after, capable of light sexual contact given the opportunity {fondling, oral stimulation of child and possibly adult}. Coercion is uncommon, may fantasize of next level.
23.     Borderline - Kids are sexy, nudity is sought after, heavy sexual contact is engaged {anal, vaginal} without pain (light pain may be encountered during training of opening). Coercion is common, may fantasize of next level.
24.     Abuser - Fully coerced sexual confrontation {Sudden random indecent exposure to child, any sexual interaction which is not desired by child defined by the child saying no, or by any violent coercion including physical and/or verbal} or kidnapping.
25.  
26. Inverse Abuse
27.  
28. This level would be considered a correct collection of values by many mainstream western people. However they are ignorant of the damage it can cause. Generally, they're always covering up their kids, don't allow them to see the opposite sex naked, don't let them see them (parents) naked, disallow masturbation, disallow girlfriend/boyfriend until much older and perhaps even comment negatively of any sexual imagery or discussion encountered in life (such as on TV or conversation). Sex is never discussed in the home, it's awkward and embarrassing. Such people are often religious, and believe their religious texts (contrary to actual fact) call for "innocence" to be preserved through childhood. Such people are the main thrust of anti-child love sentiment, categorizing all those who don't practice the same prudishness as pedophiles. It's important to include such people in this scale to highlight their extreme views and placement in child-love. Childs are sexy chicks.. no more to say
29. Neutral
30.  
31. These people are fairly rational, they are not prudish and allow their child's sexuality to mostly flourish. They are however cautious and concerned about the "pedo" label. They must consciously tell themselves to stop thinking of children in a sexual way, for fear of developing into a "pedo". They may easily support anti-pedo movements and rhetoric because such persecution makes them better than "pedo"s and absolves any thoughts of child nudity.
32. Passive
33.  
34. Passive people are similar to Neutral, except they have taken the step to consciously admire child nudity. The step may seem small in relation to the other levels in the scale, but it is significant. They have taken the first step along the positive edge of the scale but limit themselves. They may have viewed naked child pictures on the Internet before but they generally don't seek them. A passive persons motivation for joining anti-pedo rhetoric is more defensive (so as to be not labeled a pedo),
35. Active
36.  
37. Active people enjoy seeing a child sexually pleasured, they think children are sexual beings from birth and that children often initiate sexual contact desiring mutual exchanges, curious to learn more. Active people are vital to the healthy sexual development of children, so they may grow into empowered individuals, unashamed of sex and the pleasure it brings and fully aware and experienced in limits. Consented sexual contact in this level has no negative consequences for a child, except if an inverse abuser gets involved and makes a big deal over an episode of incidents making the child feel guilty...
38. Borderline
39.  
40. Cannot be condoned, but at the same time, if practiced responsibly will not impact a child. A child may very well desire anal or vaginal penetration. Their capacity to engage in such sexual activity is subject to age, their individual bodies and often progressive size training. It is a grey area, because it can be achieved safely but it depends on the responsibility of the adult - however irresponsibility would often tip the encounter into the Abusive level anyway. Most importantly, being discovered by a prudish inverse abuser, would most certainly result in the most psychological damage. The child would be put through counseling and a big deal would be made of it. Such Borderline activities are fraught with dangers and unknowns, and is the reason why it cannot be condoned, although it most certainly can occur without ill effect.
41.  
42.     No Child Pleasure - One or a series of sexual exchanges where only the adult are pleasured, is also a Borderline qualifier. The child may very well be being taken advantage of simply for the selfish sexual pleasure of the adult. The child may be 8 and really love the adult and just want to pleasure the Adult, however such a judgment is hard to confirm by someone outside the relationship.
43.  
44. Abuser
45.  
46. They are the scum of the Earth. They are the ones who rape children (according to the literal meaning of the word), defecate on babies (I've seen a video - it's horrible!) and scare kids by randomly shoving their genitals in an unsuspecting child's face. They're the creeps who have poor hygiene and are poorly groomed. They're the ones who get caught because they fondle without consent or hurt a child who then complains. They are the ones void of judgment and boundaries - without self control. They are the ones who fire up Inverse Abusers, causing them to suspect everyone is an abuser, warning all their friends to cover up their children. Unless we can educate the world of this horrible minority as an isolated level, we cannot hope to find acceptance in non-abusive levels.
47. Homosexuality
48.  
49. Homosexuality is independent of the CLS. Throughout the CLS, the relations may be hetro or homo sexual. Homosexual play is in fact common in children. A seperate scale, such as the homosexuality scale defined by Kinsey can be used as yet another axis for a persons sexuality.
50. Scientific Analysis
51.  
52. This scale would only be one sample in a scientific interview with a child lover. There are many dimensions to any behavior, and cannot be fully explained in a single measurement. Kinsey is famous for being meticulous in his research of sexual behavior. The child love scale is primarily a terse metric for categorizing a child lover and to distance the bulk of child lovers from what are clearly deplorable behaviors of those in the CLS6 category.