1. 2018-08-02 06:06:05.683 DEBUG 439 --- [DefaultMessageListenerContainer-1] com.pearson.ltg.rubric.sqs.SqsListener : SNS message
2. {
3.     "id": "cf2b9988-35b5-3d68-af90-c29d93887fc9",
4.     "operationPerformedBy": "realize_admin",
5.     "operationPerformedDateTime": "2018-08-02T06:06:05.598Z",
6.     "failureMessage": null,
7.     "status": null,
8.     "environment": "realize-nightly",
9.     "rubricImportType": "CONTENT",
10.     "rubricInfos": [
11.         {
12.             "rubricGuid": "81068973-d745-3c7e-817d-1a955517b7c6",
13.             "rubricUrl": "/home/administrator/Documents/RubricDbUpgrade/dbupgradeRubric.json",
14.             "rubricSource": "ALFRESCO",
15.             "rubricObjectId": "dbupgradeRubric.json",
16.             "rubricMetadata": {
17.                 "md5sum": "28899cda8c90fd4186760067893a67c4",
18.                 "source": "Amazon-S3",
19.                 "type": "file",
20.                 "version": "1",
21.                 "objectId": "dbupgradeRubric.json"
22.             }
23.         }
24.     ],
25.     "eventType": "RUBRIC"
26. }
27.  
28.  
29. 2018-08-02 06:06:05.689 DEBUG 439 --- [nioEventLoopGroup-2-3] com.pearson.ltg.rubric.s3.S3Service : Start the download of rubric document from S3 for key 28899cda8c90fd4186760067893a67c4
30.  
31. 2018-08-02 06:06:05.703 DEBUG 439 --- [nioEventLoopGroup-2-3] c.p.ltg.rubric.service.RubricService : Rubric serialized Rubric[<null>,0,<null>,<null>,DBUpgrade_New collection Informational Text Rubric,New collection An example rubric.,<null>,[Dimension[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Clarity and Purpose,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001, Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_002],[Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Poor,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is unstated or unclear. Evidence is absent or irrelevant to the purpose. Ideas are unfocused.,1.0], Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Weak,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is unclear. Ideas are often unfocused and not supported by evidence.,2.0], Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Good,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is clear. Most of the ideas are focused and supported by evidence.,3.0], Outcome[0,New collection Excellent,New collection The thesis is completely clear. The ideas are focused and are supported by ample and varied evidence.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Organization,[],[Outcome[0,Poor,The topic is not clearly stated, and ideas do not follow a logical progression. The conclusion does not follow from the rest of the essay.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The introduction sets forth the topic. Ideas often do not progress logically, and the conclusion does not completely follow from the rest of the essay.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The introduction is somewhat engaging and compelling. Ideas progress somewhat logically. The conclusion does not completely follow from the rest of the essay.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,The introduction is engaging and sets forth the topic in a compelling way. Ideas progress logically. The conclusion is insightful and follows from the rest of the essay.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Development of Ideas,<null>,[Outcome[0,Poor,The topic is not developed with reliable or relevant evidence. Sources are not cited. Transitions are not used to link ideas.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The topic is supported with few facts, details, and examples. Sources are often unidentified. Transitions are usually absent.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The topic is supported by facts, details, and examples. Most sources are identified. Transitions are often used to link ideas.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Varied facts, details, and examples fully support the topic. Sources are always identified. Transitions consistently link ideas.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Language and Style,[env2sp_04\G4\4_0909, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_01],[Outcome[0,Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,Conventions,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001],[Outcome[0,Poor,The essay contains numerous misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is lacking or incorrect.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The essay contains some misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is sometimes lacking or incorrect.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The essay contains few misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is usually correct.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,The essay is free from errors in spelling, punctuation, and standard English conventions.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,Language and Style,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_01],[Outcome[0,Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Language and Style,[env2sp_04\G4\4_09091a, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_0111a],[Outcome[0,New collection Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,New collection Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,New collection Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]]]]
32.  
33. 2018-08-02 06:06:05.705 DEBUG 439 --- [nioEventLoopGroup-2-3] c.p.ltg.rubric.service.RubricService : Rubric to ingest Rubric[<null>,0,<null>,<null>,DBUpgrade_New collection Informational Text Rubric,New collection An example rubric.,<null>,[Dimension[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Clarity and Purpose,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001, Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_002],[Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Poor,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is unstated or unclear. Evidence is absent or irrelevant to the purpose. Ideas are unfocused.,1.0], Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Weak,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is unclear. Ideas are often unfocused and not supported by evidence.,2.0], Outcome[0,DBUpgrade_New collection Good,DBUpgrade_New collection The thesis is clear. Most of the ideas are focused and supported by evidence.,3.0], Outcome[0,New collection Excellent,New collection The thesis is completely clear. The ideas are focused and are supported by ample and varied evidence.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Organization,[],[Outcome[0,Poor,The topic is not clearly stated, and ideas do not follow a logical progression. The conclusion does not follow from the rest of the essay.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The introduction sets forth the topic. Ideas often do not progress logically, and the conclusion does not completely follow from the rest of the essay.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The introduction is somewhat engaging and compelling. Ideas progress somewhat logically. The conclusion does not completely follow from the rest of the essay.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,The introduction is engaging and sets forth the topic in a compelling way. Ideas progress logically. The conclusion is insightful and follows from the rest of the essay.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Development of Ideas,<null>,[Outcome[0,Poor,The topic is not developed with reliable or relevant evidence. Sources are not cited. Transitions are not used to link ideas.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The topic is supported with few facts, details, and examples. Sources are often unidentified. Transitions are usually absent.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The topic is supported by facts, details, and examples. Most sources are identified. Transitions are often used to link ideas.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Varied facts, details, and examples fully support the topic. Sources are always identified. Transitions consistently link ideas.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Language and Style,[env2sp_04\G4\4_0909, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_01],[Outcome[0,Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,Conventions,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001],[Outcome[0,Poor,The essay contains numerous misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is lacking or incorrect.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,The essay contains some misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is sometimes lacking or incorrect.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,The essay contains few misspellings and errors in standard English conventions. Punctuation is usually correct.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,The essay is free from errors in spelling, punctuation, and standard English conventions.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,Language and Style,[Skills_STATE_02_14_2018\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT\Skills_STATE_02_14_2018_AT_001, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_01],[Outcome[0,Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]], Dimension[0,New collection Language and Style,[env2sp_04\G4\4_09091a, env2sp_04\G4\4_1203_0111a],[Outcome[0,New collection Poor,Word choice is vague or repetitive. Sentences lack variety and impact. Technical words are not defined. The tone is not objective.,1.0], Outcome[0,New collection Weak,Word choice is often vague or repetitive. There is little sentence variety. Most technical words are not defined. The tone is often not objective.,2.0], Outcome[0,New collection Good,Word choice is often precise and varied. Most passages contain a variety of sentence types. Most technical words are defined. The tone is usually objective.,3.0], Outcome[0,Excellent,Word choice is precise and varied. Sentences types are varied throughout. Technical words are defined.,4.0]]]]]