- Hello Harish,
 - I'm going to be extremely harsh now, because that's the easiest way for
 - me to communicate my reaction to what you write here. If you find
 - disrespect or impertinence in my writing, please know that I apologize
 - in advance. I do not write to attack you, but perhaps to attack certain
 - ideas you have expressed which I see as fallacious, and I do so lacking
 - better linguistic strategies. If you were pointing in a different
 - direction, I apologize; hopefully the remainder of my drunken rant has
 - some value greater than that of your time reading it.
 - -- extreme harshness begins --:
 - You say "we can't program consciousness". Sorry, but that statement is
 - False Bullshit Ignorance with a capital "FBI". It's completely fucking
 - wrong, and the evidence of that is all around you.
 - Look, honestly, at what programs the most advanced "I"s we know today
 - (that's an "I" separated from "AI", which some people think is an
 - important disctinction) use to UTTERLY DOMINATE the consciousnesses of
 - their children, successors, heirs, fans, et cetera. Look, honestly, at
 - how much bullshit is fed to children, successors, heirs, fans and so on
 - in the form of superstitions, religions, national identities (David
 - Brin, you're looking sadly like a nationalist douche at the moment,
 - badly in need of an Uplift), race, tradition, tribe, family and so on.
 - We, the older people, whether by accident or design, systematically and,
 - largely without consideration, program, mercilessly and without regard
 - to truth, those unto whom we can communicate and over whom we can
 - exercise influence (and, preferably, dominance -- we are, after all,
 - filthy monkey shit-slinging jerks).
 - Each and every one of us programs consciousness every day, to one degree
 - or another. Hard introverts may program only themselves, but that
 - doesn't invalidate the statement. Strident extroverts program many, and
 - most of the time it doesn't matter what their message is or what mode of
 - comprehending reality they are attempting to empart, because far too few
 - humans are capable of a sound intellectual self-defense and critical
 - evaluation of the statements and exhortations of those around them.
 - Billions of people actually believe complete the nonsense that they see
 - on TV, the ridiculous bullshit they got told by some "holy" man was
 - written down in a 7000-year-old book, the risible self-serving horseshit
 - some modern holy man who looks good on TV and who writes down things in
 - law books as if his words created truth, and on and fucking on, and the
 - cowardly pigshit, rabbitshit, parakeetshit and chihuahuashit blabberings
 - of their dependents and hangers-on.
 - THOSE PEOPLE SUFFER BAD FILTERS. Interpreting reality is fucking hard.
 - There is a lot of signal, shit-tons of noise, and we have to deal with
 - our own hormonal responses right down to the level of skin-on-skin
 - between lovers in order to develop consistent views of the world that we
 - can proudly present to others as at least perhaps of better clarity than
 - those they currently hold.
 - Now, it seems, you'd like to speak about "artificial" "intelligence". I
 - put both words in scare quotes for concrete reasons. Let's trot off to
 - Mister Rogers' Neighborhood and break those down, shall we?
 - First, MAXIMUM BRUTALITY: There is no such thing as "artificial
 - intelligence", and there never will be. Why? Because the word
 - "artificial", to most people, denotes or connotes something not
 - belonging to nature. It turns out that a lot of people have a very
 - deeply-held view about things "natural" versus "artificial". (An
 - "ANYTHINGartifical sweetener" might be immediately suspected of causing
 - cancer, while a "natural sweetener" is given a pass -- it's a pity that
 - so few people understand chemistry and physics.).
 - THERE IS NO SUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOMETHING LABELED "ARTIFICIAL" AND
 - SOMETHING LABELED "NATURAL". Well, I mean, if you're talking about
 - something like a prospective intrusion of another m-brane upon the
 - reality we already suffer, that may be, but probably 98% of people or
 - more go around thinking things about "artifical flavor" or "natural
 - healing" or "artificial intelligence" or "natu...
 - ---- MESSAGE INTERRUPTED. WAIT PLACIDLY FOR OMEGA CONTINGENCY PLAN TIME
 - CODE ----
 - .....
 - ...
 - +++ATH0
 - ATDT14076463131
 - PS: Along with the "A" in "A"I, the "I" should be in bogoquotes, too, as
 - "A""I". This goes to the idea that in fact there is no evidence that any
 - intelligence exists (Decartes was a wanker), and that there is no
 - evidence that even if as few as one such intelligence exists that it is
 - deserving of moral consideration.
 
Stikked
